Sweetest Silence (bass add)

kennyadry
Phillipines
Gitarre:
kennyadry 157 jams
Marceys
Netherlands
Tasten:
Marceys 1.605 jams
aleonz
Indonesia
Gesang:
aleonz 477 jams
mpointon
Spain
Drums:
mpointon 793 jams
Remix step IV
JoeOnBass
United States
Bass:
JoeOnBass 1.785 jams
Es gibt noch keinen Remix von dieser Session!
Daumen:
+ 4
Hochgeladen:
06.10.2021
Hörer:
527
Downloads:
0
Remixe:
0
Marceys
Ah, Kenny, Alice and Martin! Too bad they aren't around here anymore...
You gave it a great revival and lowend groove!
+1
Ernie440
Great tune and classy bass amigo!! :W:D +1
JoeOnBass
JoeOnBass So many thanks Ernie!! +1
Wade
Another great pick from the archives to which you've made such a good add. +1
JoeOnBass
JoeOnBass When you dig in, there are really, what should be award winning tracks, waiting to be discovered. I love Wikiloops for that. +1
Wade
Wade The shame is that they are locked up here and not really available to the world at large. +1
JoeOnBass
JoeOnBass I could change that if everyone was on board. +1
Wade
Wade You certainly have my OK to use anything I'm on. As it is it takes approval from everyone on any one of the tracks if it's gong to be used where there is any potential for financial gain by anyone (that may include anyone who was a sponsor?). The question could be asked in the forum with those approving stating so by answering in the forum. Might be a good idea to run it by Richard or Wolfgang first. +0
JoeOnBass
JoeOnBass For what it's worth, in my history in music, I have founded 2 record labels, one very successful, and I have often considered the idea that this type of collaboration could produce music to a marketplace sure, but more, that it could produce music for simply listening. While I don't see the potential for fiancial gain, I would gladly fund the concept of assembling and producing media for music related albums, mostly jazz or pop related, as vocalists are thin on Wikiloops, but making assembled or "albumed" works available through worldwide media distribution, like Spotify, etc. Albums can be made for download and profit can be distributed among members, marketing would have to be undertaken by, essentially me, an actual music publicist in Los Angeles, and it could be made with the potential to get virality and be enjoyed by people outside of Wikiloops, which is what we all really want, you know - to have our collaborations heard and enjoyed with the same passion which we feel after creating them. With that in mind, feel free to share this idea, and if anyone wants to talk about a collaboration, I'm open to the idea of creating something great we can all enjoy as a family. +1
Wade
Wade I'd suggest putting the proposition to Richard first then canvas the members through the forum. I'm very much in favor, but as it is currently, every person who is on a track that's used would need to give permission.

I would have loved to have seen an internet radio station and encouraged that many years ago, but Richard instead chose to put a "radio" inside the site which is of course not accessible to anyone outside. I'd hoped that an external window could have generated funding, sales or whatever that would then primarily fund wikiloops. This site has had a very tentative start with little funding. However Richard is 100% owner and is also very possessive of what's here.

I'd be keen to see what's possible outside of here and use the tracks that are here (if that's possible). There's a mountain of great tracks. Having them waste away is really not right in my opinion.

Some years ago I'd also suggested giving clues to a TV journalist to make a short documentary about Wikiloops. Richard did take this in, but then ignored all the other information I'd given him that would have best ensured success. (I'd been involved with documentaries back in the 1970s with PBS). The result was an awful amateur video that was a total embarrassment. Fortunately it was never made public. The site is basically unknown and could be a "scoop" for someone enterprising to pick up.

Other possibilities are targeted genre's/styles that could be licensed to "stream" to public places like cafes, hotels, spas, etc. that would be keen to have non commercial well selected music that fit's their image.

Anything that generates interest, funds, and can give the person who does the work a living is fair IMHO. It would also be nice for the musicians to get that kind of exposure. Although none of us on Wikiloops are here to become "famous" we are musicians without a real audience...that's just wrong!

What do you think?
+0
JoeOnBass
JoeOnBass I have a radio station on www.allhardrock.com, though technology has updated since I created it and it doesn't always adapt to phones, though I'm confident I could fix that in short order. A station like that would work well for all of us here because ti simply plays directly in the browser and is available worldwide, with no expense other than a hosting account, and with a label, I would make that available almost instantly. Few people understand the equation of creating a label, it's actually math, but the numbers labels put into the equation decides who receives benefit and what gets paid out. I am infavor of the artist getting due payment, but with the reuqirements to get music delivered to a worldwide audience, it's effort just to get expenses covered, and if the right numbers are put into the equation, artists get a split of 50% of the profit, provided a profit can be created. I would actually offer that in the profit split, that 50% be split to include donating profits to the continuation of Wikiloops as the platform this creativity was founded through. That way, we all always have the means to work together and it helps ensure that this is more than a hangout but rather a firm application that provides for the creation of music and serves as a single entity online to create something of a label that serves the greater good of musicians around the world in unity. No one else has this, it's just Wikiloops, and while many may want in, it seems the hobbyists wash out and the proven remain, constributing to something that's just on the edge of acclaim, but still behind the paywall. It's great for all of us because we get to create marvelous works together, but i could expand the end product to cherished around the globe with a little work and a very small amount of personal funding and we would all have something bigger to be part of that helps to support the platform we all work collaboratively though. It could be a win-win situation, but everyone would have to be on board. +1
Wade
Wade Go for it! +1